Does altitude increase the risk of traumatic aortic injuries? A retrospective cohort study among six level I trauma centers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic aortic injuries (TAIs) are rare but are associated with a high mortality. Prior studies have shown skiers and pilots, whose injuries occur at high altitudes, are at an increased risk for a TAI. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of altitude on the incidence of TAIs across all causes of injury. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at six Level I trauma centers (8/1/2016-1/1/2020) included adult blunt trauma patients with a chest or abdomen injury. High altitude injuries (> 5000 ft.) were compared to low altitude injuries (≤ 5000 ft.). The primary outcome was incidence of TAI. RESULTS: There were 8562 patients, 37% were at high altitude and 63% at low altitude. High altitude patients were older (p < 0.01), more often Caucasian (p < 0.01) and had a higher ISS (p < 0.01). There was a significantly greater incidence of TAI at high altitude than low altitude (1.5% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01). The median altitude was significantly higher for patients with a TAI than for patients without a TAI (5100 ft. vs. 1400 ft., p = 0.01). After adjustment, high altitude patients had 2-fold [OR: 2.4 (1.6, 3.7)] greater odds of having a TAI than low altitude patients. CONCLUSION: TAIs were more prevalent among high altitude injuries. Providers should be aware of the increased incidence of TAIs at high altitudes particularly when there is a delay in diagnosis and transfer to a trauma center with appropriate resources to manage these critical injuries. TAI screening at high altitude trauma centers may improve survival rates.

Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury and Contemporary Management Strategy.

Thoracic aortic injury (TAI) is a leading cause of death in blunt chest trauma. Motor vehicle collisions are the commonest cause, and most patients die before receiving medical attention. Survivors who make it to the hospital also typically have other debilitating injuries with high morbidity. It is imperative to understand the nature of these injuries and implement current management strategies to improve patient outcomes. A literature review on contemporary management strategies on blunt thoracic aortic injuries was performed to evaluate the available evidence using online databases (PubMed and Google Scholar). We found that there has been an improved survival owing to the current advancement in diagnostic modalities, the use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography, and contemporary management techniques with an endovascular approach. However, careful assessment of patients and a multidisciplinary effort are necessary to establish an accurate diagnosis. Minimal aortic injuries (intimal tear and aortic hematoma) can be managed medically with careful monitoring of disease progression with imaging. Endovascular approaches and delayed intervention are key strategies for optimal management of high-grade TAI.

Traumatic aortic injury: Computed tomography angiography imaging and findings revisited in patients surviving major thoracic aorta injuries.

Blunt chest trauma related acute thoracic aortic injury (TAI) is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt diagnosis and appropriate management because of high mortality. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the imaging of choice for evaluation of patients with major chest trauma findings suspicious of TAI on chest radiography. This case series describes the CTA findings in four high-velocity incident survivors with associated TAIs, discusses the injury type and treatment, and reviews the literature.

A National Analysis of Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Repair: Does Insurance Status Matter?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic thoracic aortic injuries (TAIs) carry a substantial mortality. Our study aim was to evaluate the impact of insurance status on outcomes in severely injured trauma patients after either thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or open repair using the National Trauma Data Bank Research Data Set (NTDB-RDS). METHODS: The NTDB-RDS was reviewed for outcomes in severely injured patients and TAI repair method (TEVAR vs open). Patients were divided into insured (Medicaid, Medicare, private insurance) and uninsured (self-pay) status groups. Patients were further divided by injury severity score (ISS) of 15-24 and ≥25 to adjust for injury burden. Demographic characteristics and outcome measures were compared. Chi-square, t-test, and analysis of variance were used with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Within the NTDB-RDS, a review of nearly 1 million patients led to 241 that underwent repair for TAI and had insurance status and repair type documented. 88.8% (214/241) of patients were insured, while 11.2% (27/241) of patients were uninsured. There were no significant differences in repair type based on insurance status. For open repair with an ISS ≥25, mortality was significantly higher in the uninsured group compared with insured (55.5% vs 21.9%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: For open repair in patients with TAI and high injury burden, uninsured status was associated with a significant increase in mortality rate compared with insured patients. Future studies should investigate the effect of insurance type on TAI outcomes and causes of higher mortality in uninsured patients.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Repair: Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: Blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) carry a substantial mortality rate. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with open repair from trauma centers across the United States using the National Trauma Data Bank-Research Data Set (RDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank-RDS was reviewed for thoracic aortic injures and repair methods. Patients were divided into two groups: TEVAR versus open repair. Demographics and outcomes were compared between groups. Mortality rate was adjusted using the observed/expected mortality (O/E), with TRISS methodology by using the Revised Trauma Score with the Injury Severity Score. Chi-square test and t-test were used with significance defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Within the 2016 RDS, there were 275 cases that underwent operative repair for BTAI. Of the 275 operative cases, 62.5% (172/275) had TEVAR and 37.5% (103/275) underwent open repair. Mean age in TEVAR group was 41 and open repair group was 36 (P > 0.05). Mean Injury Severity Score for TEVAR was 36 versus 35 for open repair (P > 0.05). Mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.7 in TEVAR versus 5.5 in open group (P > 0.05). TEVAR patients had significantly lower crude mortality rate versus open repair (11% versus 25.2%, P < 0.005). When adjusted using O/E, the TEVAR group also had significantly less deaths versus open repair (0.40 versus 0.68, P < 0.000008). CONCLUSIONS: For BTAIs, thoracic endovascular aortic repairs were superior to open repair on injury-adjusted, all-cause mortality.

[Endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries]. / Tompa trauma okozta mellkasi aortasérülések endovascularis ellátása.

INTRODUCTION: A new era has begun in the last two decades with the advent of endovascular methods in the therapy of blunt thoracic aorta injuries. Our experiences with the endovascular interventions of blunt aortic trauma in the Cardiovascular Center of Semmelweis University are summarised here. METHODS: We included those patients who underwent endovascular intervention due to blunt aortic trauma in a university hospital between 1998 and 2014. The statistical analysis was performed with the use of Excel. RESULTS: 41 patients were selected from our database. There were 34 males, the average age was 47 years (±17 years). Among the 41 patients 15 underwent an acute procedure (12 ruptures) and 26 patients received delayed treatment (in 4 cases due to growing of the pseudoaneurysm). There was only one early postoperative death. Late mortality was 22.5% and 7.5% was related to the aortic injury. CONCLUSION: Our late mortality and complication rates were similar to other studies, which reinforces international experiences. In the cases when delayed treatment is feasible, the patient can be stabilized and the CTA images can be analyzed for precise stentgraft planning. The treatment of blunt thoracic aorta injured patients should take place in specialized centers capable of such endovascular interventions.

Cardiac Trauma.

Cardiac trauma is a leading cause of death in the United States and occurs mostly due to motor vehicle accidents. Blunt cardiac trauma and penetrating chest injuries are most common, and both can lead to aortic injuries. Timely diagnosis and early management are the key to improve mortality. Cardiac computed tomography and cardiac ultrasound are the 2 most important diagnostic modalities. Mortality related to cardiac trauma remains high despite improvement in diagnosis and management.

Identification of Cardiac and Aortic Injuries in Trauma with Multi-detector Computed Tomography.

Blunt and penetrating cardiovascular (CV) injuries are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Rapid detection of these injuries in trauma is critical for patient survival. The advent of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has led to increased detection of CV injuries during rapid comprehensive scanning of stabilized major trauma patients. MDCT has the ability to acquire images with a higher temporal and spatial resolution, as well as the capability to create multiplanar reformats. This pictorial review illustrates several common and life-threatening traumatic CV injuries from a regional trauma center.

Therapeutic Plan for Traumatic Truncal Arterial Injury Associated with Truncal Organ Injury

PURPOSE: The appropriate management of traumatic truncal arterial injury is often difficult to determine, particularly if the injury is associated with severe additional truncal lesions. The timing of repair is controversial when patients arrive alive at the hospital. Also, there is an argument about surgery versus stent-graft repair. This study's objective was to evaluate the appropriate method and the timing for treatment in cases of truncal abdominal injury associated with other abdominal lesions. Methods: The medical records at Ajou University Medical Center were reviewed for an 8-year period from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2008. Twelve consecutive patients, who were diagnosed as having had a traumatic truncal arterial injury, were enrolled in our study. Patients who were dead before arriving at the hospital or were not associated with abdominal organ injury, were excluded. All patients involved were managed by using the ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support) guideline. Data on injury site, the timing and treatment method of repair, the overall complications, and the survival rate were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Every case showed a severe injury of more than 15 point on the ISS (injury severity score) scale. The male-to-female ratio was 9:3, and patients were 41 years old on the average. Sites of associated organ injury were the lung, spleen, bowel, liver, pelvic bone, kidney, heart, vertebra, pancreas, and diaphragm ordered from high frequency to lower frequency. There were 11 cases of surgery, and one case of conservative treatment. Two of the patients died after surgery for truncal organ injury: one from excessive bleeding after surgery and the other from multiple organ failure. Arterial injuries were diagnosed by using computed tomography in every case and 9 patients were treated by using an angiographic stent-graft repair. There were 3 patients whose vessels were normal on admission. Several weeks later, they were diagnosed as having a truncal arterial injury. CONCLUSION: In stable rupture of the truncal artery, initial conservative management is safe and allows management of the major associated lesions. Stent grafting of the truncal artery is a valuable therapeutic alternative to surgical repair, especially in patients considered to be a high risk for a conventional horacotomy.

Tratamento endovascular de ruptura traumática da aorta torácica descendente / Endovascular treatment of traumatic descending thoracic aortic rupture

Paciente do sexo feminino, 55 anos de idade, vítima de atropelamento, foi admitida em unidade de emergência, onde se realizou o diagnóstico clínico, radiológico e tomográfico de ruptura traumática da aorta torácica descendente. Diante do achado, a paciente foi encaminhada para tratamento endovascular com colocação de endoprótese auto-expansível (stent) pela artéria femoral. O tratamento obteve sucesso, evidenciado pela exclusão da lesão localizada previamente no istmo aórtico. O tratamento endovascular tem sido indicado nas afecções de aorta torácica descendente com bons resultados iniciais. Na ruptura traumática de aorta, a terapêutica endovascular representa uma alternativa aceitável, especialmente devido aos riscos do tratamento operatório convencional.

A 55-year-old, female patient who was run over by a motor vehicle was admitted at an emergency room. Clinical, radiological and tomographic diagnosis of traumatic descending aortic thoracic rupture was performed. The patient was referred for endovascular treatment with placement of a self-expandable stent through the femoral artery. Treatment was successful, with exclusion of the lesion previously located in the aortic isthmus. Endovascular treatment has been indicated in the treatment of descending thoracic aortic diseases, with good initial results. In case of traumatic aortic rupture, endovascular treatment is a feasible alternative, especially due to risks offered by the conventional surgical treatment.